1. If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
2.  
3.  
4. The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
5. It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
6.  
7. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
8.  
9. The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
10.  
11. However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
12.  
13. Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
14. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
15.  
16. If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.
17.  
18. While this sounds like something that's good however, people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.
19.  
20. However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. what is a safe distance from a cell tower have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
21.  
22. This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
23. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
26.  
27. safe distance from cell tower is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
28.  
29. In https://etextpad.com/ there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.
30.  
31. Website: https://dodd-farah.thoughtlanes.net/what-lengths-away-from-the-5g-mobile-system-had-you-been