1. If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
2.  
3. The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
4. A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
7.  
8. safe distance to live from cell phone tower (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.
9.  
10. However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can result in various possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
11.  
12. Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
13. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
14.  
15. In the event that you've used mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
16.  
17. Although this may sound like something that's good however, those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.
18.  
19. This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
20.  
21. This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
22. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
23.  
24. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
25.  
26.  
27. The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
28.  
29. Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.
30.  
31. Homepage: https://click4r.com/posts/g/9250560/