1. If what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
2.  
3. The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
4. safe distance from cell tower is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
7.  
8. The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
9.  
10.  
11. But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
12.  
13. Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
14. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
15.  
16. If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.
17.  
18. While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more vulnerable to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were distance from them.
19.  
20. But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
21.  
22. This is because RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
23. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
26.  
27. The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. what is a safe distance from a cell tower do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
28.  
29. Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.
30.  
31. Website: https://note1s.com/notes/3NZFO7Z