If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone. 
 
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although http://tieburn0.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/33975101-what-is-the-safest-distance-coming-from-a-5g-cell-tower?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog 're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people. 
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds 
 
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health. 
 
 
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue. 
 
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could result in many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer. 
 
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz. 
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure 
 
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower. 
 
Although this may sound like something that's good however, people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas. 
 
This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues. 
 
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs. 
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure 
 
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating). 
 
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such Visit website shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards. 
 
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. https://weaponblood8.bravejournal.net/post/2023/04/27/How-long-Can-You-Proceed-From-the-5G-Portable-Tower-Without-Becoming-Unsafe could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne. 

Homepage: https://weaponblood8.bravejournal.net/post/2023/04/27/How-long-Can-You-Proceed-From-the-5G-Portable-Tower-Without-Becoming-Unsafe