1. If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
2.  
3. The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
4. A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
7.  
8. The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
9.  
10. However, because what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
11.  
12. Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
13. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
14.  
15. If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.
16.  
17. While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.
18.  
19. However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
20.  
21. This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
22. what is a safe distance from a cell tower on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
23.  
24. This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
25.  
26.  
27. Furthermore, safe distance to live from cell phone tower and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.
28.  
29. My website: http://b3.zcubes.com/v.aspx?mid=11174396