1. If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
2.  
3. These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create issues for users.
4. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
7.  
8. The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
9.  
10. However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can result in various potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
11.  
12. Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
13. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
14.  
15. Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
16.  
17.  
18. While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
19.  
20. However, what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
21.  
22. This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
23. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
26.  
27. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
28.  
29. Additionally there is safe distance to live from cell phone tower that both ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.
30.  
31. Homepage: https://mcdaniel-secher.thoughtlanes.net/how-long-can-you-get-coming-from-a-5g-portable-tower-without-getting-unsafe-1682610856