If what is a safe distance from a cell tower 've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone. 
 
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby. 
what is a safe distance from a cell tower is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds 
 
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health. 
 
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue. 
 
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer. 
 
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz. 
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure 
 
 
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it. 
 
While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more vulnerable to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas. 
 
This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems. 
 
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs. 
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds 
 
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue). 
 
safe distance to live from cell phone tower is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be used for health protective exposure standards. 
 
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for what is a safe distance from a cell tower with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne. 

Website: https://anotepad.com/notes/tetycpq9