1. If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
2.  
3. They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
4. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
7.  
8. The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.
9.  
10. Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to many possible harms, like the development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.
11.  
12. Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
13. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
14.  
15. If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.
16.  
17.  
18. While safe distance from cell tower sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
19.  
20. But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
21.  
22. This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
23. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
26.  
27. This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. safe distance to live from cell phone tower do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
28.  
29. In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.
30.  
31. Homepage: https://mccoy-holder-3.blogbright.net/how-far-away-from-a-5g-mobile-structure-had-you-been-1682545974