1. If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
2.  
3. They are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
4. It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6.  
7. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.
8.  
9. The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.
10.  
11. But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
12.  
13. Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
14. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
15.  
16. If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.
17.  
18. While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.
19.  
20. However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
21.  
22. This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, safe distance from cell tower is the biggest organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
23. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
26.  
27. The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
28.  
29. In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In what is a safe distance from a cell tower , psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.
30.  
31. Homepage: https://nonon-centsnanna.com/members/masktext17/activity/129181/