1.  first glance to represent damage unequivocally, more careful assessment leaves these
2.  findings somewhat equivocal. In the case of increased cases of pregnancy among
3.  these girls, for example, it should be noted that over half of those who reported having
4.  become pregnant (and nearly half of the men who reported impregnating someone) rated
5.  their experience as "great" rather than "poor." Although it's true that difficulties sometimes serious problems - may attend such pregnancies in U.S. society, some data
6.  also imply that these difficulties have been exaggerated (Furstenberg et al., 1987;
7.  Stevens-Simon and White, 1991), and may frequently result more from low SES than from
8.  adolescent pregnancy itself (Trussell, 1988). Current treatment of teen pregnancy as
9.  intrinsically pathological may in part have generalized from an entire tendency to view
10.  Teen sexual behaviour as problematic (see Willis, 1986, for a sharply satirical
11.  Depiction of this inclination).
12.  Even findings of increased cases of STD transmission among the girls in our study
13.  need to be considered carefully. Symons (February 1995, private communication)
14.  pointed out that increased cases of STDs and pregnancy among women exposed to
15.  primal scenes might be more parsimoniously comprehended as reduced use of condoms
16.  among these women. Regardless of problematic result, decreased use of condoms may
17.  be inspired by heightened want (and capacity) for affair or higher levels of trust in
18.  partners - in addition to by simple lack of sexual obligation or self-destructive inclinations.
19.  In http://www.datarecoveryinfo.us/go.php?url=http://wnude.com should be remembered that there was a (nonsignificant) trend toward higher
20.  levels of self acceptance and enhanced relations with adults among these women.
21.  Path of advantageous correlates for boys, and impersonal or debatable correlates for girls.
22.  These interactions may be interpreted in several ways.
23.  that human males and females process sexuality-related occasions otherwise as the effect of
24.  sexually dimorphic mental mechanisms that have evolved through natural and
25.  Empirical evidence is consistent with
26.  the opinion of dimorphism in emotional mechanisms (cf. http://w.urbansprawlband.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=nude-beach.net , 1994; Ellis and
27.  Symons, 1990). Moore (1995) has proposed the possibility that these mechanisms might
28.  begin to appear faithfully in youth. Some evidence is, in addition, consistent with this
29.  suggestion (cf. Gold and Gold, 1991; Knoth et al., 1988; Rind and Tomorovich, 1997).
30.  Other explanations of the sex interactions are also possible. By way of example, boys and
31.  girls are socialized differently through the entire world where sexuality is concerned, with
32.  girls being socialized more restrictively (Mead, 1967). Although these socialization
33.  Processes may also represent expressions of sexually dimorphic mental
34.  adaptation by natural and sexual selection, it could be claimed that they instead represent
35.  temporally unique but global sociocultural or socioeconomic powers related to
36.  patriarchal control of female sexuality.
37.  A third explanation of our results is more prosaic.
38.  Totally artifactual statistical noise. Truly, the effect sizes are modest, and although
39.  interactions by sex in the same general direction were noticed for a number of the consequence
40.  measures, only one of these interactions reached significance after the Bonferonni
41.  correction, and one of them was reversed in direction - with women, but not men,
42.  exposed to primal scenes reporting less use of certain drugs.
43.  Additionally, while findings of advantageous consequences are interesting, particular findings are
44.  not called by any theory that we know. Hence, http://testmastersmcat.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=wnude.com is possibly left with what may turn
45.  out to be nonreplicable advantageous correlates of the predictors.
46.  observed, http://apocpa.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=x-nudism.com is the typical fate for long term regression studies,
47.  Especially when proximate, rather than distal, predictors are being analyzed. In our
48.  Perspective, then, the significance of the current investigation, aside from the suggestion of
49.  interactions by sex, lies not so much in positive findings as in the negative findings for
50.  Admittedly, any one
51.  set of negative results is not especially insightful. Nonetheless, given almost no
52.  Signs in this or any other empirical study the behaviours analyzed in the current
53.  study are unambiguously dangerous, the interesting question becomes: Why is it so broadly
54.  believed in America and certain European nations that these practices are
55.  uniformly damaging to the mental health of children?
56.  professional and public opinion.) Such notions, certainly w http://scaif.org/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=nudism.name exposure to parental
57.  nudity is concerned, are maybe better conceptualized as myths.
58.