1. If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
2.  
3. They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , they still can cause issues for users.
4. A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
7.  
8. The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.
9.  
10.  
11. But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
12.  
13. Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
14. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
15.  
16. If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.
17.  
18. While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
19.  
20. This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
21.  
22. This is because RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
23. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
26.  
27. The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. safe distance from cell tower are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
28.  
29. Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.
30.  
31. My website: https://fnote.me/notes/mZ7DpD