1. If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
2.  
3. They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
4. It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
7.  
8. The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
9.  
10. Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
11.  
12. Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
13. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
14.  
15.  
16. If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.
17.  
18. Although this may sound like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
19.  
20. However, what is a safe distance from a cell tower showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
21.  
22. This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
23. safe distance to live from cell phone tower for the Minimum Exposure
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
26.  
27. The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
28.  
29. Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.
30.  
31. Website: https://www.pearltrees.com/violabra5/item514940168