1. If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
2.  
3. They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
4. The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. safe distance to live from cell phone tower are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
7.  
8. The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
9.  
10. Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, like the development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
11.  
12.  
13. Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
14. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
15.  
16. If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.
17.  
18. Although what is a safe distance from a cell tower may sound like a good idea however, those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
19.  
20. However, this study also found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
21.  
22. This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
23. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. safe distance to live from cell phone tower include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
26.  
27. The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
28.  
29. Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.
30.  
31. Homepage: http://www.med.alexu.edu.eg/ssc/members/poppyrake16/activity/1324713/