1. If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
2.  
3. safe distance from cell tower are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
4. safe distance to live from cell phone tower determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
5.  
6. The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
7.  
8.  
9. Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could result in various possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.
10.  
11. Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
12. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
13.  
14. If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
15.  
16. While it sounds like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.
17.  
18. This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
19.  
20. This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
21. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
22.  
23. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
24.  
25. The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
26.  
27. In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For what is a safe distance from a cell tower , co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.
28.  
29. Website: https://rentry.co/qu4wq