1. If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
2.  
3. https://fnote.me/notes/FrWbH6 are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
4. A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
7.  
8. The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
9.  
10. But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
11.  
12. Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
13. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
14.  
15. If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
16.  
17. While this sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.
18.  
19. This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
20.  
21. This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
22. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
23.  
24. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
25.  
26.  
27. The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
28.  
29. Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In safe distance from cell tower of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.
30.  
31. Website: https://fnote.me/notes/FrWbH6