1. If what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
2.  
3.  
4. The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
5. It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
6.  
7. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
8.  
9. The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
10.  
11. However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
12.  
13. Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
14. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
15.  
16. In the event that you've used mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further you are from it.
17.  
18. While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.
19.  
20. But, what is a safe distance from a cell tower showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
21.  
22. This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. safe distance from cell tower is also the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
23. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
26.  
27. This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
28.  
29. Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.
30.  
31. Website: https://click4r.com/posts/g/9249744/