1. If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. safe distance from cell tower look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
2.  
3. These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
4. A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. safe distance to live from cell phone tower of exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
7.  
8. safe distance from cell tower (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
9.  
10. However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
11.  
12. Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
13. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
14.  
15. In the event that you've used mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.
16.  
17. While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
18.  
19. However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
20.  
21. This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
22. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
23.  
24. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
25.  
26.  
27. The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
28.  
29. Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.
30.  
31. Homepage: https://www.pearltrees.com/salarybeach9/item515568468