1. If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
2.  
3. The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
4. It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
7.  
8. The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
9.  
10. However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to various potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
11.  
12. Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
13. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
14.  
15. Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
16.  
17.  
18. Although this may sound like something that's good however, people who live close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further distance from them.
19.  
20. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
21.  
22. This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
23. safe distance from cell tower for the Minimum Exposure
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
26.  
27. https://onepetcare.com/members/muscleeagle84/activity/149846/ overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
28.  
29. In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.
30.  
31. Homepage: https://onepetcare.com/members/muscleeagle84/activity/149846/