1. If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
2.  
3. They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
4. The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
7.  
8. what is a safe distance from a cell tower (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
9.  
10.  
11. Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
12.  
13. Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
14. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
15.  
16. If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.
17.  
18. Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.
19.  
20. This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. what is a safe distance from a cell tower have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
21.  
22. This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
23. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
26.  
27. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
28.  
29. In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.
30.  
31. My website: https://gonzalez-mollerup.hubstack.net/what-lengths-should-i-keep-from-your-5g-mobile-tower-1682543969