1. If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
2.  
3.  
4. They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
5. It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
6.  
7. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
8.  
9. The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
10.  
11. But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can result in many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
12.  
13. Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
14. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
15.  
16. Have you ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
17.  
18. Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
19.  
20. However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
21.  
22. This is because the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
23. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. what is a safe distance from a cell tower include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
26.  
27. This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore safe distance from cell tower shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
28.  
29. Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.
30.  
31. My website: https://squareblogs.net/hourease82/very-best-safest-distance-from-the-5g-cell-tower-tn76