1. If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
2.  
3. These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
4. A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
5.  
6. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
7.  
8.  
9. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.
10.  
11. But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
12.  
13. Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
14. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
15.  
16. If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.
17.  
18. Although this may sound like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.
19.  
20. This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
21.  
22. This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
23. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
24.  
25. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
26.  
27. The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. safe distance to live from cell phone tower are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
28.  
29. In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.
30.  
31. Website: https://postheaven.net/chillweasel1/are-usually-safest-distance-from-your-5g-cell-system